Abstract:
"The work described in this paper compares the performance of a high rate algal pond and a
Waste Stabilisation Pond system. To achieve the comparison water samples were collected at
regular intervals from both the inlet and outlet of each system and tested for E coli, turbidity,
suspended solids, chlorophyll a, BOD5, and the nutrients NH4, NO3, NO2, and PO4. Over a 2
year period at both sites there was continuous logging of weather data (air temperature, wind
speed and direction, rainfall, humidity, total solar radiation and ultraviolet (UV) radiation) and
water data ( pH, temperature and Dissolved Oxygen). Comparison is made between the removal
rate of the key nutrients and E coli and also between key water parameters. Of great importance
in Australian conditions is the ability to harvest and re-use treated water. The paper also
compares the percent of influent water lost to evaporation from the two systems."
Author:
Neil Buchanan, Nancy Cromar, Natalie Bolton, Howard Fallowfield