Abstract:
The following is an analysis of the central role played by energy in the development of human
society, the environmental consequences that this development has had and the actions
which are being taken to counter these consequences. To support the analysis of an otherwise
non-technical paper, the scientific concepts which define energy systems, as well as the
technical mechanisms which allow its transformation, storage and deployment are
thoroughly examined. This scientific overview is accompanied by historical accounts of the
entrepreneurial efforts and corporate strategies which gave rise to the modern energy
landscape. After having outlined the current energy balance, focus is placed on petroleum
products and electricity, identified as the two main forms of energy consumed. The history
and relevant technical aspects of these two forms of energy are laid out to provide an
understanding of their rise to prominence and their current functioning. In the second part of
this paper, an analysis is carried out of the ways in which our climate is changing, the extent
to which these changes are attributable to energy systems, the significance of these changes
for human society and the relevance of different technical factors in shaping potential policy
responses. In its third part, the paper presents an analysis of the different technologies which
are seen as contributing positively to the energy transition; looking separately at stationary
energy and mobility applications. Both are found to be heavily dependent on the ability to
store electricity, leading to an analysis of storage technologies and, consequently, Lithium. As
the raw material at the heart of the most promising developments in electricity storage,
Lithium is considered to be fundamental to the energy transition in the case of electric
vehicles; accounting for the largest part of the first stage in the value-chain. Its significance is
also symbolically and structurally important, as an extractive resource in the value-chain of
an industry otherwise committed to shifting away from resources and towards processes. The
conclusion seeks to draw on the knowledge laid out over the course of the paper, in providing
a set of high-level recommendations to three distinct types of actors, seen as occupying
different but equally important roles in the transition: financial investors and corporate
managers, policy-makers and climate-change activists.
Institution:
ESADE Business School (Ramon Llull University)