Abstract:
"Stabilizing global temperature will require a shift to renewable or nuclear power from fossil
power and the large-scale deployment of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) for remaining fossil fuel
use. Non-climate co-benefits of low-carbon energy technologies, especially reduced mortalities
from air pollution and decreased ecosystem damage, have been important arguments for policies
to reduce CO2 emissions. Taking into account a wide range of environmental mechanisms and
the complex interactions of the supply chains of different technologies, we conducted the first life
cycle assessment of potential human health and ecological impacts of a global low-carbon
electricity scenario. Our assessment indicates strong human health benefits of low-carbon
electricity. For ecosystem quality, there is a significant trade-off between reduced pollution and
climate impacts and potentially significant ecological impacts from land use associated with
increased biopower utilization. Other renewables, nuclear power and CCS show clear ecological
benefits, so that the climate mitigation scenario with a relatively low share of biopower has lower
ecosystem impacts than the baseline scenario. Energy policy can maximize co-benefits by
supporting other renewable and nuclear power and developing biomass supply from sources with
low biodiversity impact."