Abstract:
Global warming, fossil fuel depletion, the growth of large new economies, and the latent
risks of terrorism and international conflict are weaving an uncomfortable stranglehold
on the world’s energy outlook. This is reflected by an extreme volatility in energy
commodity prices and associated economic disruptions, superimposed over long-term
environmental worries.
The International Energy Agency, through its programs such as Solar Heating and
Cooling*, is actively working to advance the new energy technologies and strategies
needed to meet future demand while reducing dependence on the liquid fossil fuels that
currently drive the planet’s economies.
Often cited alternatives include clean coal, nuclear, and an array of renewable options:
hydropower, biomass/biofuels, geothermal, ocean thermal energy conversion, waves,
tides, wind, solar, etc. In the eyes of leaders and decision makers, developing such a mix
of alternatives is a reasonable approach to bring about the desired stable energy future --
akin to putting future energy eggs in different baskets. However this view presupposes
that all alternatives have a comparable capability. Hence the purpose of this brief note: to
step back and take a fundamental look at their respective potential.
Author:
Richard Perez and Marc Perez